Bison (ground)
28.0gprotein / 100g146 cal · 2.4g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.92
Pork Tenderloin
26.0gprotein / 100g143 cal · 3.5g fat · $$ · Quality 0.92
Per 100g, Bison (ground) comes in at 28.0g of protein against Pork Tenderloin's 26.0g, a 2.0g gap that's noticeable across a full day's eating but won't make or break either choice on its own.
Protein quality is essentially matched between the two — both land in a similar tier for amino acid completeness.
On price, Pork Tenderloin wins clearly — $$ against Bison (ground)'s $$$$.
With protein content this close, cost is the more useful tiebreaker: Pork Tenderloin delivers a similar protein profile to Bison (ground) at a noticeably lower price per serving.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Bison (ground) | Pork Tenderloin |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28.0g | 26.0g |
| Calories | 146 | 143 |
| Fat | 2.4g | 3.5g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Relative cost | $$$$ | $$ |
| Prep time | 10 min | 25 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, bison (ground) or pork tenderloin?
Bison (ground) has 28.0g of protein per 100g compared to Pork Tenderloin's 26.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Pork Tenderloin is lower in calories per 100g, at 143 vs the other's 146.