Pinto Beans (cooked)
9.0gprotein / 100g143 cal · 0.7g fat · $ · Quality 0.6
Amaranth (cooked)
4.7gprotein / 100g102 cal · 1.6g fat · $$$ · Quality 0.75
Pinto Beans (cooked) delivers a clearly higher protein density than Amaranth (cooked) — 9.0g vs 4.7g per 100g, a gap of 4.3g that adds up fast across multiple servings.
Amaranth (cooked) pulls ahead on protein quality specifically (lit_estimate, near-complete pseudo-grain, higher lysine than most grains), even in categories where Pinto Beans (cooked) wins on raw grams.
Pinto Beans (cooked) is also the cheaper option ($ vs $$$), which matters if you're eating either one regularly rather than occasionally.
Pinto Beans (cooked)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (640mg vs Amaranth (cooked)'s 380mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.
With protein content this close, cost is the more useful tiebreaker: Pinto Beans (cooked) delivers a similar protein profile to Amaranth (cooked) at a noticeably lower price per serving.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Pinto Beans (cooked) | Amaranth (cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.0g | 4.7g |
| Calories | 143 | 102 |
| Fat | 0.7g | 1.6g |
| Carbs | 26.2g | 18.7g |
| Fiber | 9.0g | 2.1g |
| Quality score | 0.6 | 0.75 |
| Relative cost | $ | $$$ |
| Prep time | 90 min | 20 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, pinto beans (cooked) or amaranth (cooked)?
Pinto Beans (cooked) has 9.0g of protein per 100g compared to Amaranth (cooked)'s 4.7g.
Which is lower in calories?
Amaranth (cooked) is lower in calories per 100g, at 102 vs the other's 143.