Pork Chop (bone-in)
27.0gprotein / 100g231 cal · 14.0g fat · $$ · Quality 0.9
Lamb (leg, roasted)
25.0gprotein / 100g258 cal · 16.0g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.91
Per 100g, Pork Chop (bone-in) comes in at 27.0g of protein against Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 25.0g, a 2.0g gap that's noticeable across a full day's eating but won't make or break either choice on its own.
Protein quality is essentially matched between the two — both land in a similar tier for amino acid completeness.
Budget-wise, Pork Chop (bone-in) runs meaningfully cheaper per typical serving ($$) than Lamb (leg, roasted) ($$$$).
Pork Chop (bone-in)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (2200mg vs Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 1980mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.
With protein content this close, cost is the more useful tiebreaker: Pork Chop (bone-in) delivers a similar protein profile to Lamb (leg, roasted) at a noticeably lower price per serving.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Pork Chop (bone-in) | Lamb (leg, roasted) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27.0g | 25.0g |
| Calories | 231 | 258 |
| Fat | 14.0g | 16.0g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.9 | 0.91 |
| Relative cost | $$ | $$$$ |
| Prep time | 15 min | 90 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, pork chop (bone-in) or lamb (leg, roasted)?
Pork Chop (bone-in) has 27.0g of protein per 100g compared to Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 25.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Pork Chop (bone-in) is lower in calories per 100g, at 231 vs the other's 258.