Pork Chop (bone-in)
27.0gprotein / 100g231 cal · 14.0g fat · $$ · Quality 0.9
Soybeans (mature, cooked)
18.2gprotein / 100g173 cal · 9.0g fat · $ · Quality 0.85
This isn't close. Pork Chop (bone-in) packs 27.0g of protein per 100g against Soybeans (mature, cooked)'s 18.2g — a 8.8g gap driven mostly by how concentrated or diluted each food naturally is.
On protein quality specifically, Pork Chop (bone-in) scores higher — lit_estimate, complete animal protein — compared to Soybeans (mature, cooked), which is DIAAS-adjusted, complete plant protein.
Soybeans (mature, cooked) is the more budget-friendly pick ($ vs $$ for Pork Chop (bone-in)), worth weighing if cost matters more than the other differences here.
If you're eating plant-based, this comparison is moot — Soybeans (mature, cooked) fits, Pork Chop (bone-in) doesn't.
Pork Chop (bone-in)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (2200mg vs Soybeans (mature, cooked)'s 1400mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.
The real deciding factor is dietary fit, not macros: choose Soybeans (mature, cooked) if you need it to be plant-based, choose Pork Chop (bone-in) otherwise — the protein numbers are close enough that diet compatibility should lead.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Pork Chop (bone-in) | Soybeans (mature, cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27.0g | 18.2g |
| Calories | 231 | 173 |
| Fat | 14.0g | 9.0g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 8.4g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 6.0g |
| Quality score | 0.9 | 0.85 |
| Relative cost | $$ | $ |
| Prep time | 15 min | 90 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, pork chop (bone-in) or soybeans (mature, cooked)?
Pork Chop (bone-in) has 27.0g of protein per 100g compared to Soybeans (mature, cooked)'s 18.2g.
Which is lower in calories?
Soybeans (mature, cooked) is lower in calories per 100g, at 173 vs the other's 231.